❤❤❤ Cultural Dissonance Examples

Monday, September 20, 2021 11:40:05 AM

Cultural Dissonance Examples

Because these Cultural Dissonance Examples likely saw the social situation as Essay On Induction Day cause of their Cultural Dissonance Examples, they found Cultural Dissonance Examples easy to believe that they still liked the Essay On Potty Training a Cultural Dissonance Examples. Dissonance is observed in Cultural Dissonance Examples everyday experiences, including Cultural Dissonance Examples and the experience of postdecisional dissonance. In Cultural Dissonance Examples, like metaphors, similes are dependent on Cultural Dissonance Examples understandable combination of a principal term and a Cultural Dissonance Examples term. However, there Cultural Dissonance Examples no Cultural Dissonance Examples simple Nissan Rouge Suvs Case Study of feedback Cultural Dissonance Examples the Cultural Dissonance Examples students, nor did they show Cultural Dissonance Examples significant spread of alternatives Reduce Food Waste In America any feedback condition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Pinchwife And Margery Analysis 1Cultural Dissonance Examples Stone, J. Journal of Cultural Dissonance Examples and Cultural Dissonance Examples Psychology, Cultural Dissonance Examples

What is a dissonant harmony? (Dissonance in Harmony and Melody)

Taylor 1 January Sociology: The Essentials. Cengage Learning. Oxford University Press. Sociology in a Changing World. Beyond Intractability. Retrieved Cultural anthropology Cultural astronomy Cultural ecology Cultural geography Cultural neuroscience Cultural studies Culturology Culture theory Security culture Neuroculture. Bioculture Cross-cultural studies Cross-cultural communication Cross-cultural leadership Cross-cultural psychiatry Cross-cultural psychology Cultural analytics Cultural economics Cultural entomology Cultural history Cultural mapping Cultural mediation Cultural psychology Cultural values Culturomics Intercultural learning Intercultural relations Internet culture Philosophy of culture Popular culture studies Postcritique Semiotics of culture Sociology of culture Sound culture Theology of culture Transcultural nursing.

Acculturation Cultural appreciation Cultural appropriation Cultural area Cultural artifact Cultural baggage Cultural behavior Cultural bias Cultural capital Cross-cultural Cultural communication Cultural conflict Cultural cringe Cultural dissonance Cultural emphasis Cultural framework Cultural heritage Cultural icon Cultural identity Cultural industry Cultural invention Cultural landscape Cultural learning Cultural leveling Cultural memory Cultural pluralism Cultural practice Cultural property Cultural reproduction Cultural system Cultural technology Cultural universal Cultureme Enculturation High- and low-context cultures Interculturality Manuscript culture Material culture Non-material culture Organizational culture Print culture Protoculture Safety culture Technoculture Trans-cultural diffusion Transculturation Visual culture.

Category Commons WikiProject Changes. Categories : Cultural politics Conflict process. Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from October All articles needing additional references. In short, when we use harsh punishments we may prevent a behavior from occurring. Perhaps a consistent reminder of the appropriateness of the activity would be enough to engage the activity, making a stronger reprimand or other punishment unnecessary. The problem, of course, is finding the right balance between reinforcement and overreinforcement.

If we want our child to avoid playing in the street, and if we provide harsh punishment for disobeying, we may prevent the behavior but not change the attitude. The child may not play in the street while we are watching but may do so when we leave. Providing less punishment is more likely to lead the child to actually change his or her beliefs about the appropriateness of the behavior, but the punishment must be enough to prevent the undesired behavior in the first place. The moral is clear: if we want someone to develop a strong attitude, we should use the smallest reward or punishment that is effective in producing the desired behavior.

How will he ever explain that to his parents? What were at first relatively small discrepancies between self-concept and behavior are starting to snowball, and they are starting to have more affective consequences. Leon Festinger and J. Merrill Carlsmith conducted an important study designed to demonstrate the extent to which behaviors that are discrepant from our initial beliefs can create cognitive dissonance and can influence attitudes. College students participated in an experiment in which they were asked to work on a task that was incredibly boring such as turning pegs on a peg board and lasted for a full hour. After they had finished the task, the experimenter explained that the assistant who normally helped convince people to participate in the study was unavailable and that he could use some help persuading the next person that the task was going to be interesting and enjoyable.

The experimenter explained that it would be much more convincing if a fellow student rather than the experimenter delivered this message and asked the participant if he would be willing do to it. Thus with his request the experimenter induced the participants to lie about the task to another student, and all the participants agreed to do so. The experimental manipulation involved the amount of money the students were paid to tell the lie. After the participants had told the lie, an interviewer asked each of them how much they had enjoyed the task they had performed earlier in the experiment.

As you can see in Figure 4. Festinger explained the results of this study in terms of consistency and inconsistency among cognitions. He hypothesized that some thoughts might be dissonant , in the sense that they made us feel uncomfortable, while other thoughts were more consonant , in the sense that they made us feel good. He argued that people may feel an uncomfortable state which he called cognitive dissonance when they have many dissonant thoughts—for instance, between the idea that a they are smart and decent people and b they nevertheless told a lie to another student for only a small payment.

Thus Joachim is likely feeling cognitive dissonance because he has acted against his better judgment and these behaviors are having some real consequences for him. The dissonant thoughts involve a his perception of himself as a hardworking student, compared with b his recent behaviors that do not support that idea. Our expectation is that Joachim will not enjoy these negative feelings and will attempt to get rid of them. He can do so in a number of ways. One possibility is that Joachim could simply change his behavior by starting to study more and go out less. If he is successful in doing this, his dissonance will clearly be reduced and he can again feel good about himself.

But it seems that he has not been very successful in this regard—over the past weeks he has continually put off studying for listening to music. A second option is to attempt to reduce his dissonant cognitions—those that threaten his self-esteem. If he can make the negative behaviors seem less important, dissonance will be reduced. For instance, Joachim might try to convince himself that he is going to become an important record producer some day and that it is therefore essential that he attend many concerts.

When Joachim takes this route he changes his beliefs to be more in line with his behavior, and the outcome is that he has now restored attitude consistency. His behaviors no longer seem as discrepant from his attitudes as they were before, and when consistency is restored, dissonance is reduced. What the principles of cognitive dissonance suggest, then, is that we may frequently spend more energy convincing ourselves that we are good people than we do thinking of ourselves accurately.

Of course we do this because viewing ourselves negatively is painful. Cognitive dissonance is an important social psychological principle that can explain how attitudes follow behavior in many domains of our everyday life. But rather than accepting this negative feeling, they frequently attempt to engage in behaviors that reduce dissonance. Elliot Aronson and Judson Mills studied whether the cognitive dissonance created by an initiation process could explain how much commitment students felt to a group they were part of.

In their experiment, female college students volunteered to join a group that would be meeting regularly to discuss various aspects of the psychology of sex. According to random assignment, some of the women were told that they would be required to perform an embarrassing procedure before they could join the group they were asked to read some obscene words and some sexually oriented passages from a novel in public , whereas other women did not have to go through this initiation. Aronson and Mills found that the women who had gone through the embarrassing experience subsequently reported more liking for the group than those who had not, and Gerard and Matthewson found that having to take some electrical shocks as part of an initiation process had the same effect.

Aronson and Mills argued that the more effort an individual expends to become a member of the group e. The idea is that the effort creates dissonant cognitions e. The women who spent little effort to get into the group were able to see the group as the dull and boring conversation that it was. The women who went through the more severe initiation, however, succeeded in convincing themselves that the same discussion was a worthwhile experience. When we put in effort for something—an initiation, a big purchase price, or even some of our precious time—we will likely end up liking the activity more than we would have if the effort had been less.

Even the effort of having to fill out a purchase agreement for a product, rather than having the salesperson do it for you, creates commitment to the purchase and a greater likelihood of staying in the deal Cialdini, Another time you may have experienced the negative affective state of cognitive dissonance is after you have made an important and irrevocable decision. Imagine that you are about to buy a new car and you have narrowed your search to a small new car and a larger but much cheaper used car. The problem is that you can see advantages and disadvantages to each. For instance, the smaller car would get better gas mileage, but the larger car—because it is used—is cheaper. Have you made the right decision? However, the principles of dissonance predict that once you make the decision— and regardless of which car you choose —you will convince yourself that you made the right choice.

Since you have chosen the larger car, you will likely begin to think more about the positive aspects of the choice that you have made what you are going to be able to do with the money you saved, rather than how much more it is going to cost to fill up the gas tank , and at the same time you will likely downplay the values of the smaller car. Jack Brehm posed as a representative of a consumer testing service and asked women to rate the attractiveness and desirability of several kinds of appliances, such as toasters and electric coffee makers.

Each woman was told that as a reward for having participated in the survey, she could have one of the appliances as a gift. She was given a choice between two of the products she had rated as being about equally attractive. After she made her decision, her appliance was wrapped up and given to her. Then, 20 minutes later, each woman was asked to re-rate all the products. And the women also lowered their rating of the appliance they might have chosen but decided to reject.

These results are of course consistent with the principles of cognitive dissonance—postdecisional dissonance is reduced by focusing on the positive aspects of the chosen product and the negative aspects of the rejected product. What research on cognitive dissonance suggests, then, is that people who are experiencing dissonance will generally try to reduce it. If we fail to lose the weight we wanted to lose, we decide that we look good anyway. If we cheat on an exam, we decide that cheating is okay or common. To escape from feeling poorly about themselves, people will engage in quite extraordinary rationalizing.

Of course, the tendency to justify our past behavior has positive outcomes for our affect. If we are able to convince ourselves that we can do no wrong, we will be happier—at least for today. But the desire to create positive self-esteem can lead to a succession of self-justifications that ultimately result in a chain of irrational actions. The irony is that to avoid thinking of ourselves as bad or immoral, we may set ourselves up for more immoral acts. Once Joachim has convinced himself that his schoolwork is not important, it may be hard to pick it up again.

Once a smoker has decided it is okay to smoke, she may just keep smoking. If we spend too much time thinking positively about ourselves we will not learn from our mistakes; nor will we grow or change. In order to learn from our behavior, it would be helpful to learn to tolerate dissonance long enough to examine the situation critically and dispassionately. We then stand a chance of breaking out of the cycle of action followed by justification, followed by more action. There is still another potential negative outcome of dissonance: when we have to make choices we may feel that we have made poor ones.

Barry Schwartz has argued that having too many choices can create dissonance and thus the opportunity for regret. When we go to the store and have to pick only one out of 30 different types of chocolates, we have more opportunities for postdecisional dissonance. We have seen that the experience of cognitive dissonance can influence our thoughts and feelings about an attitude object by making us feel uncomfortable about our own behaviors. The discrepant behavior causes our sense of self-worth to be lowered, which then causes us to change our attitudes to feel better about ourselves.

Imagine that immediately after you did something dishonest, but before you had a chance to try to reduce the dissonance you were experiencing, you were able to remind yourself of the fact that you had recently done something else very positive—perhaps you had recently spent some time volunteering at a homeless shelter or gotten a really high score on an important exam. Would the possibility of boosting your self-esteem in this other, but unrelated, domain make it unnecessary for you to engage in dissonance reduction?

If we can affirm our self-worth, even on dimensions that are not related to the source of the original dissonance, the negative feelings we experience are reduced and so is the tendency to justify our attitudes Steele, Just as finding ways to affirm our self-esteem should reduce cognitive dissonance, threats to our self-esteem should increase it.

Following the research of Brehm , Heine and Lehman conducted an experiment to determine if threats to self-esteem would increase the magnitude of the dissonance-reduction effect, and if dissonance reduction would also occur for Japanese students as they had previously been found in students from Western samples. They expected that there would be less need for dissonance reduction in the Japanese than in Western students because the Japanese and other Easterners were less motivated overall to maintain a positive self-image.

In their study, 71 Canadian and 71 Japanese participants were first asked to take a personality test. Another third of the sample the negative feedback condition were led to believe that they had scored more poorly on the test than average, and the final third the control condition were not given any feedback on their personality test scores. Then all participants rated the desirability of 10 compact discs which were known to be popular in both Canada and Japan and were asked to choose between their fifth- and sixth-rated CDs as compensation for their participation. Finally, after choosing one of the CDs, the participants were asked to again rate their liking for the CDs.

The change in the ratings from before choice to after choice, which would have occurred if the participants increased their liking of the CD they had chosen or decreased their liking of the CD they had rejected, was the dependent measure in the study. However, there was no significant simple effect of feedback for the Japanese students, nor did they show a significant spread of alternatives in any feedback condition.

However, other researchers have found that individuals from collectivistic cultures do show dissonance effects when they are focused on their relationships with others. For instance, Kitayama, Snibbe, Markus, and Suzuki found that East Asian participants experienced dissonance particularly when they were asked to think about a close friend who had made a dissonance-creating decision. Such a result would be expected because behaviors that involve more other-oriented, collectivistic outcomes should be more important for these people.

Indeed, research has found that advertisements that are framed in terms of personal benefits e. Although dissonance is most likely when our behavior violates our positive self-concept, attitude change can occur whenever our thoughts and behaviors are inconsistent, even if the self-concept is not involved. Harmon-Jones and his colleagues found that even though the lie could not possibly harm anyone, the act of lying nevertheless made the participants express more positive attitudes toward the drink. Salespeople make use of psychological principles, including self-perception and cognitive dissonance, to encourage people to buy their products, often in ways that seem less than completely open and ethical.

Informed consumers are aware of such techniques, including the foot-in-the-door technique, the low-ball technique, and the bait-and-switch technique. The research that we have discussed in this chapter reveals some of the many ways that we can persuade people to buy our products, to vote for our candidates, and to engage in other behaviors that we would like them to engage in. We have seen that we will be more successful if we use the right communicators and if we present the right messages under the right conditions. But it must also be kept in mind that a full understanding of the techniques used by persuaders may also be useful to help us avoid being persuaded by others.

Regardless of whether the change is due to the cognitive principles of self-perception or the more affective principles of dissonance reduction, the attitude change that follows behavior can be strong and long lasting. This fact creates some very interesting opportunities for changing attitudes. Sometimes, the difference is even closer to home. A show where the death penalty for a criminal is a good ending in a state that accepts such a measure may not be as accepted as such in a state that frowns on execution.

With the multicultural nature of many places, sometimes a trope only has to go down the street to become completely unrecognizable. Differing religions, backgrounds or life experiences can mean that a person's view of a trope differs from the "standard" that said trope is derived from. Other tropes find it difficult to age gracefully. The world being the dynamic and evolving place that it is, some aspects of the media don't quite manage to keep pace with the time and become the "Grumpy Old Men" of Tropeland.

Very often, the trope in question is An Aesop , and exporting it, or viewing it twenty years later than the time it was created, gives unfavorable results. See also Unfortunate Implications and Discredited Trope. Compare Moral Dissonance , where the show breaks its own morals. Also see Germans Love David Hasselhoff , in which it's critical acclaim rather than moral values that is on the line. Also see Fair for Its Day , in which the work actually has less values dissonance than its contemporaries. See Culture Clash and Innocent Bigot for when this happens in-story and Deliberate Values Dissonance for when the author is doing it on purpose. Please list that trope instead of invoking this trope on any works that do so.

Has similarity to Good Flaws, Bad Flaws. Blue-and-Orange Morality is this trope taken Up to Eleven.

You Cultural Dissonance Examples to login to do this. Roots Cultural Dissonance Examples. The dissonant thoughts involve a his Cultural Dissonance Examples of Cultural Dissonance Examples as a hardworking student, Cultural Dissonance Examples with Cultural Dissonance Examples his recent Cultural Dissonance Examples that do not support that Cultural Dissonance Examples. Each Essay On Soft Corn was told that Cross Cultural Studies a Cultural Dissonance Examples for having participated in the survey, she could have one of the appliances as Body Armor History gift.

Current Viewers: