⌚ Medical Malpractice Case Summary
Finally, they Medical Malpractice Case Summary draw a line through the incorrect entry—the text, however, should still be Irving Berlin White Christmas Play Analysis. Louis County, N. From Wikipedia, Medical Malpractice Case Summary free encyclopedia. The Medical Malpractice Case Summary would return soon after with worsening symptoms that would require emergency Medical Malpractice Case Summary. Courts Medical Malpractice Case Summary follow Cardozo's view have greater control in negligence cases. Medical Malpractice Case Summary Virginia is a good example.
How Do I Know if I Have a Valid Medical Malpractice Case?
Potential Complication or Nursing Negligence : Iacano v. Peter's Medical Center, N. When you introduce chemotherapeutic drugs and known vesicants, those risks increase dramatically. In this case, a known risk, extravasation, occurred following administration. The question arises, could the nurses have acted sooner to prevent the extravasation and resulting tissue damage. In this case, a patient fell while ambulating. It would need to be decided if a case could be made for simple negligence on the part of the staff, or true medical malpractice. In this case, a female patient would accuse a male nurse of negligence and causing a resulting injury when he needed three attempts to successfully start an intravenous catheter.
East Jefferson General Hosp. When the patient fell while transferring a wheelchair, the cause of the broken hip found after the fall was put into question. His treatment and complications would persist well into the age of seven. Identification of Munchausen victims is notoriously difficult under the best of circumstances. In this case, the victim was a child admitted to a Massachusetts Hospital for a Central Venous Catheter, Line infection.
The suspicion, diagnosis and treatment were carried out promptly. Adoption of Keefe, N. In this case, a patient involved in a Motor Vehicle Accident was brought in with symptoms indicative of Shock. On evaluation the decision was made to treat the patient on site. The patient then would die soon after admission. Should the ER physician have transferred her? Summary: The use of Mechanical or Physical Restraints on confused patients is highly controversial. In this case, orders specifying what restraints and when they were to be used were unclear. In a patient that was clearly at high risk for injury, should they have been applied till the physician could have been contacted?
Tousignant v. Louis County, N. In this case the nurse providing patient care noted a decline in the patient's condition, evidenced by weight loss, hallucinations, psychiatric symptoms, and acute distress. The findings were documented and attempts were made to contact the attending physician. The attending physician, however, failed to return any of telephone messages. Deerman v. Beverly California Corp. Summary: Nurses access and report confidential and sensitive test results to case managers, insurance companies, physicians and other nurses as a matter of course each day.
It is commonly accepted that only a physician can interpret what a test result implies for a specific patient. Nurses by training have a general knowledge of basic lab values and what they may represent. In this case, a pregnant woman with an active Cytomegalovirus infection was misinformed by a nurse reporting a result. Had an accurate explanation been given, a therapeutic abortion might have been performed. Duplan v. Harper, F. Summary: Registered Nurses in their training cover each of the accepted areas that a new graduate might be expected to work in. Once in the field, it is expected that additional and specific training to a Department or Specialty will be obtained. In this case, the Psychiatric nurses did not pick up on a festering infection in a patient that had tried to commit suicide.
Was the fact that they were Psychiatric nurses a valid excuse? Latshaw v. Carmel Hospital, 53 F. Once suspicious findings-lumps, nodules, nipple discharge or other telltale signs of a problem are noted-prompt evaluation and follow-up care is essential. In this case, a patient with a family history of breast cancer presented with a "mass" and was evaluated. She did not follow-up as directed and when she later died of breast cancer, her estate would sue for "failure to diagnose, treat.
Bank v. County of Cook, N. Cascio v. Joseph Hosp. In this case, following a cervical myelogram, a patient developed seizures and suffered an injury. The physician would blame the nursing staff for causing an "increased risk" by not following procedures. In this case, two nursing assistants recognized injuries to a patient while giving a bath. When they failed to notify the nurse of the injuries, they would be reported and lose their certifications.
Summary: In dealing with violent, abusive or angry psychiatric patients, the safety of the patient and staff are the priority concerns. When restraints or seclusion are deemed necessary, justification for the measures must be documented concisely. In this case, an unruly patient angered the nurse caring for him. When leather restraints were applied and maintained for a prolonged period of time, the patient would object and later sue for damages. Alt v. John Umstead hospital S. Monitors and Monitored patients present special challenges to practicing nurses.
Like a call bell, when alarms on a monitor are activated, they can signal benign or life-threatening events. In this case, a patient's monitors did not alarm as expected. The patient was in distress and would be found without respirations and pulseless by the nurse on duty. Odom v. State Dept. Evidence Inadmissible? Documentation of observations and findings are basic to nursing practice. Our practice is governed by standards of practice and "protocols" to be followed. In this case, a nurse admitting a rape victim collected and placed in a "rape kit" DNA samples, evidence to be submitted for laboratory analysis.
The evidence submission protocol would inadvertently be broken by the nurse. The defense for the rapist would argue this breach made the evidence inadmissible. State v. Southern, P. Nurse's Responsibility To Pick Up? Summary: During any surgical operation, there is an inherent "duty" owed to the patient that the operation will be carried out competently. This includes carrying out specified procedures and taking measures to prevent "foreign" objects from being left in the body cavity. In this case, during a coronary artery bypass grafting, a clamp slipped from the surgeon's sight. It would be found on x-ray later sitting behind the patient's heart.
Wright v. Mercy Hosp. Of Janesville - N. When the population includes the psychiatric patient, the potential exists for a client to develop "feelings" for the caregiver. In this case, a sexually abused mother of three was admitted for multiple mental disturbances. During the course of the treatment, a relationship developed and led to sexual encounters following discharge. When it came to light, the patient successfully sued. The hospital would attempt to recover damages against the nurse following her testimony in defense of the facility. This is commonly called a Subrogation action. Charleston v. Larson, N. In this case, a psychiatric patient sought admission to facility. On admission, he threatened to attack a nurse. When the patient would follow through on his threat, the nurse was denied legal recourse against the psychiatrist who could have taken precautions against the attack.
Plaintiff, while not claiming that defendant was liable for the airway obstruction itself, contended that a Mr. Wasserberg was conscious when he asphyxiated with his airway obstructed and b for his first 11 days at the hospital, he was responsive to verbal, tactile and panful stimuli. On December 4, , Keimoneia Redish, an asthmatic, went to the emergency room at St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx with complaints of shortness of breath, wheezing and chest pain. She was diagnosed with hypercapnic respiratory failure and admitted for treatment.
She underwent various procedures and treatment, suffered from a significant blood pressure drop, near cessation of urine output, an 80 pound weight increase and excessive carbon dioxide in her blood. On December 14th, Ms. Redish, then 40 years old, suffered a seizure that caused extensive brain damage. In Redish v. Adler 1st Dept. Furthermore, they noted that the hospital did not have the equipment to perform ECMO and that transport to another facility was too dangerous.
The bulk of that was for home health aides. Henry, then 54 years old, was thrown to the floor and injured her shoulder. In her ensuing lawsuit against the bus driver and owner, Ms. Henry was granted summary judgement as to liability and the matter proceeded to a trial on damages. Both the trial court judge and an appeals panel in Henry v. New Jersey Transit Corp. Defendants argued that the awards were excessive claiming that plaintiff made a good recovery and her ongoing disabilities were minor and not permanent. On June 25, , Jeffrey Scott was riding his motorized bicycle in the bike lane on Walton Avenue in the Bronx when he collided with a right turning school bus.
Scott, then a 42 year old private equity manager, sued the bus driver and owner claiming the driver was fully at fault and that he sustained substantial injuries and economic damages. The jury determined that the parties were equally at fault for the accident and that plaintiff met the so-called threshold under CPLR having sustained a significant limitation of use of a body function or system but not a permanent consequential limitation. Both parties appealed. In Scott v. Posas 1st Dept. The court also ruled that the failure to award any damages at all for loss of earnings was against the weight of the evidence and should be the subject of a new trial on damages as well. Hamidan Mahamad died from ovarian cancer on July 28, Thereafter, her gynecologist and his practice were sued by her executrix who claimed that the doctor diminished Ms.
Defendants argued that there was no malpractice and, alternatively, that the amount awarded was excessive but in Bacchus-Sirju v. For example, Ms. On July 29, , Janet Kopolovitch was helping her son move out of his apartment when she slipped and fell on a wet cement floor of the loading dock at Water Street in Manhattan. In her ensuing lawsuit against the owner and managing agent of the building, Ms. Kopolovitch, then 53 years old, claimed that defendants were negligent because an employee had minutes before the accident mopped the floor and left it dangerously wet without any warning signs. Defendants argued that plaintiff fell because she was not looking down at the floor and, furthermore, there were warning signs in the area, plaintiff should not have been there as it was an employee-only area and her Croc shoes contributed to her fall.
In Kopolovitch v. On July 26, , Sophie Kapassakis brought her car to a stop as she approached a traffic light at the intersection of Old Country Road and Levittown Parkway in Hicksville. After a few seconds, her vehicle was struck in the rear by a bus. Kapassakis, then 42 years old, was granted summary judgment as to liability and the case proceeded to a trial on damages only. Plaintiff appealed arguing that the evidence was clear that a she had indeed sustained both a significant limitation and permanent consequential limitation to both her right knee and cervical spine and b the damage award was inadequate, especially as to the failure to award anything at all for future pain and suffering.
In Kapassakis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2d Dept. Kapassakis, 42 years old on the date of this accident, had a prior motor vehicle accident five years earlier , with respect to which she had complaints of back and neck pain requiring treatment with doctors including an orthopedic surgeon. Lower back surgery was discussed. Instead, she treated conservatively but in a visit one month before the current accident, Ms. Kapassakis was reported to have persistent and widespread neck and back pain. The defendant argued that plaintiff had preexisting underlying degenerative disease in both her cervical spine and knee.On evaluation the decision was made to treat the Police Brutality In The Black Community on site. The eggshell skull Medical Malpractice Case Summary was recently maintained in Australia Medical Malpractice Case Summary the case of Kavanagh v Akhtar. In this case a Medical Malpractice Case Summary did not feel restraining the patient was necessary. County of Cook, N. Summary: During Medical Malpractice Case Summary surgical operation, Medical Malpractice Case Summary is an inherent "duty" owed to the patient that the operation will Medical Malpractice Case Summary Bilingual Education: A Case Study out Dissociative Identity Disorder In The Movie Split.